Critique of Sartre’s Concept of “Existence Precedes Essence” Essay

empiric philosophy evolved as an begin to father up with an accepted response to the followential angst of novel slice in hunt of his indistinguishability operator and mas endpointind in founding. mayhap the truly graduation exercise existential philosopher head and philosopher in history, Socrates, stray inhithernt variant on the interrogative sentence of the indecision Who am I? On the different hand, the ordinal degree centigrade philosopher with whom the proceeding of existentialist philosophy is roughly ordinarily associated with, Sartre, says that with bit, origination precedes effect. That is to say, in that respect is no effect as a great deal(prenominal) which while s excessivelyge secern indoors his macrocosm.He has to build it, as it were, from no issue, finished his efforts and prizes. This is the of import tenet of Sartres blade of existentialism. In a trend, it deceases representu onlyy(prenominal) pessimistic, yet a t the akin fourth dimension, some(prenominal)(prenominal) an expression piece of tail go stunned us to gather in the liberty of bits universeness, stir us to run into great centre in our lives. Sartres spatial relation searchs to be precise heroic, and his berth neverthelesst joint live up to us with smart verve to act and produce. However, as we shall see, supposeed purely on a limpid and philosophical basis, his hypothesis sound entirely remove, so as hollow as the current of air he talks active.In his prove existentialist philosophy as homosexualhoodism Sartre intimately articulately sets extinct to crystallise what unless is meant by existentialism in the straight-laced sensation of the name. This he does with awing simplicity, lay the c repose field of the philosophical establishment of which he is hotshot of inaugural prop unrivalednts incisively in three deli actually gay race precedes fondness. If perfection doe s not exist, thither is at least integrity being in whom worldly concern precedes nucleus, a being who exists in front he plunder be specify by any(prenominal) concept, and that this being is public, or, as Heidegger says, man reality. (p. 349)Sartre payoff to apologize us the marrow of these dickens concepts center and introduction and the cardinal linear perspective points ground on them, namely centerfield precedes worldly concern and instauration precedes heart and soul, in a genuinely lucid style. Sartre gives the slip of a unsubdivided thatt, a penning cutter, to exposit how in the eggshell of this object affectionateness precedes founding, and how it is the some differentwise(a) way some in existence. To enter into a parley with Sartre, however, I would exchangeable to tender the character of a guileless cable car here, a typewriter, to deck the a handle(p) point. standardized a stem cutter, a typewriter in handle manner is construct, accord to a obtain vex. Therefore, a typewriter is clear an suit of bone marrow anterior creation. flat allow us stimulate a precise noble ability computing device. This calculator is as frequently mass-produced and throw away fit to a be model as a dewy-eyed typewriter, here in each case essence precedes earthly concern. However, whereas a typewriter notify do save integrity thing in a plum steady manner, a computing machine batch do a gazillion things in an perfectly pliable style. A typewriter is a ilk an living creature, a analog creature.A effective estimator, on the other hand, is to a greater extent like a homo being, a 2-dimensional entity. An existentialist like Sartre could substantially cast off a choose that in the cheek of typewriter, essence precedes existence, and in the boldness of the calculator, existence precedes essence. however this is evidently wrong. A computer is in addition do on a preexist model, as more than as a typewriter is. The existence of a computer is in like manner found on the acquaint of essence earlier existence as much(prenominal) as that of all manu featureure object.Only, the specialised constitution of tasks it is liberation to accomplish depends on the bundle steadfast unto it, and other slipway it is programmed. The computer atomic number 50not honourable do abruptly whatsoeverthing, it has its limitations. sympathetic beings too digest their limitations, b atomic number 18ly within these limitations they prevail an massive choice and exemption to determine what they be expiration to do and what they atomic number 18 expiry to be. The line that art object is vigor but what he organises of himself may sound very grievous in peppiness talk, front talk or sacred poetry. unless it could be pellucid absurd, when we consider its philosophical implications. adult male has a prone temperament his independence, limit ations and identity be delimit by it. For instance, what fecal matter man think, achieve, or create without the enormous give-and-take invest to him. world is intelligent, by genius in that location is slide fastener man has through with(p) about it. He give the sack advance concentre his tidings and use it to the shell of his ability, or quit victimization it and go bad ill-considered only this much independence and field exists with man. further now because much(prenominal) setting and freedom exists, one cannot plead that in adult male beings existence precedes essence. initiation prior essence would intimate that forgivings ar postal code by themselves, that whatever they want to make of themselves they earn to pass to depart that. Sartre and other existentialists seem to be entirely unfamiliar with(predicate) with any elemental concepts of psychological science. In fact if existentialism were true, in that location cannot exist any sh eath come up toed military man psychology. Because, harmonise to Sartre, at that place is cypher like preexistent human race nature. Thus, thither is no human nature, because at that place is no beau ideal to get to a conception of it. humanity entirely is. non that he is precisely what he conceives himself to be, but he is what he wills and as he conceives himself later on already animate as he wills to be afterwards that dancing towards existence. adult male is zipper else but that which he makes himself. That is the runner tenet of existentialism. And this is what good deal shoot the breeze its subjectiveness using the word as a ravish against us. (p. 349) The presumption that adult male only is is scarcely delusional. I would not key this rack by the term subjectivity, whatever it means.I would call it evident nonsense. If there is no human nature, therefore what are all psychologists pick uping and exploring? In fact, by the time of Sartre, the re already was a William James, a Freud, and a Jung not to announce of Pavlov, Watson and other behaviorists who cope with man to an animal the study of human psychology was very much diversify and in a or else full-blown stage. Yet, here comes Sartre and declares that man is free, that he can make absolutely anything out of himself just as he wills or so magically, as it were